MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Location: file:///C:/B0940E36/PlBdMins-16Feb06.htm Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
BOROUGH OF
PLANN=
ING
BOARD – REGULAR MEETING
FEBRU=
ARY
16, 2006
The Regular Meeting of the Borough of Norwood Planni= ng Board convened at 8:02PM with Chairman Edward T. Gallagher presiding. Following the Pledge Allegiance, M= r. Gallagher announced that this meeting is conducted pursuant to the Open Pub= lic Records Act and indicated the exit locations as required by law.
The following board members were present: Joseph
Ascolese, Helen Guercio, Demetrios Milliaressis, Chairman Gallagher, and Ed=
ward
Lamp. Mayor Kaplan arrived shortly after the start of the meeting. The Board
Attorney Robert T. Regan was present as was Fred Gregni representing Neglia
Engineering Associates, the Board Engineers. The following board members we=
re
absent: Joseph Ascolese, Craig Jacobs, Councilman Michael Knigin, Robert Sk=
low
and Haresh Savalia.
At this time Mayor Kaplan arrived.
Block=
153,
Attorney Craig Hughes came forward representing Todd
Janovic in connection with this application for a two-lot subdivision
consisting of approximately 12,500 square feet, which currently contains a
single family dwelling and detached garage. Applicant proposes to divide
subject property into two lots approximately 7,500 and 5,000 square feet
respectively. The existing dw=
elling
is situated on the lot in such a way that most of the property is not utili=
zed
and the proposed dwelling is located on the extreme left side of subject
property. One third of existi=
ng
neighboring lots are of approximately 5,000 square feet in size as proposed=
for
the second lot. Applicant has no immediate plans to build on the new lot.
At this time, Mr. Hughes advised that taxes are curr= ent, no prior subdivision application has been made and all parties have been noticed as required by statute.
A discussion took place between Mr. Hughes, Mr. Rega= n and the board concerning the extreme divergence from the zoning regulations that this application proposes. The board requested that applicant provide testimony regarding the type of vari= ance (C-1 or C-2) proposed and professional planning testimony because of the substantial reduction of zoning requirements. Following discussion and conferenc= e with Mr. Janovic, the applicant agreed to return to the March or April meeting w= ith a professional planner, provide notice as a courtesy to the public, and wai= ves time limitations.
REPORT &=
#8211;
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
Ms.
Christine Hageman
Ms. Hageman reported that she has forwarded the ANJEC timetable to board members and that Neglia Engineering is preparing the maps for this project. The Environ= mental Commission held an initial meeting with the consultant in order to provide = him with an overview of their requirements.&nb= sp; Consultant is currently working on the environmental resource invent= ory, which includes baseline mapping of flood plains, wetlands, soil and steep slopes. Ms. Hageman explained= the basic premise of the program, which includes the Central Woods and Fox Hill undeveloped areas of town. &nbs= p; The consultant will provide a report to the Governing Body along with public hearings for comment on land use options for these areas in accordan= ce with the Master Plan. Project should complete within six month and the next Environmental Commission meet= ing is scheduled for March 13, 2006, 8:00PM at the Borough Hall.
&nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p;
PAGE TWO, FEBRUARY 16, 2006
&=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; Block
155, Lot 19, 29 & 30 (R10 Zone)
&=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp;
&n=
bsp;  =
; &n=
bsp;  =
; &n=
bsp;  =
; DEVELOPERS AGREEMENT-SIGNATURE
&nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; Block 100, Lots 10 & 11
&=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp;
A discussion followed regarding the Norwood Plaza Livingston Street Beautification Program contribution estimated by Neglia at $80,244 for improvements, including six-foot paver sidewalk, reduced to $68= ,760 since the cost of said improvement is included in the performance bond.
Mr. Milliaressis offered a motion to table this matt=
er
until the next meeting, pending formation of a review committee and action =
list
to guarantee completion of beautification items as formulated by the
board. Seconded by Ms. Guerci=
o.
Additional discussion took place concerning enforcement and attention to
resolution detail by the Building Dept. during construction of past project=
s as
approved by the board. Joseph L. Ascolese, Ms. Guercio and Mr.
Milliaressis voted yes. Mr.
Gallagher, Mayor Kaplan and Mr. Lamp voted no.
Mayor Kaplan offered a motion to authorize Mr.
Gallagher’s signature of the Developer’s Agreement in the above=
-referenced
matter. Seconded by Mr. Lamp.=
Joseph
L. Ascolese, Mr. Gallagher, Mayor Kaplan and Mr. Lamp voted yes. Ms. Guercio and Mr. Milliaressis v=
oted
no.
&n=
bsp;  =
; &n=
bsp;  =
; &n=
bsp; ZONING SUBCOMMITTEE
Mr. Gallagher announced that the next Zoning Subcomm= ittee is scheduled for Tuesday, February 28, 2006, 8:00PM at Borough Hall and reported that the committee is currently working on parking issues including commercial and residential zones and signage.
A discussion followed concerning formation of a
Beautification Subcommittee to work apart from the existing Governing Body
committee with those board members that are a part of the first committee to
proceed as members of both bodies.
Mayor Kaplan reported that the Beautification Committee awaits appro=
val
from the county in the restructure of
&n=
bsp;  =
; &n=
bsp;  =
; &n=
bsp; RESOLUTIONS – NONE
&n=
bsp;  =
; &n=
bsp;  =
; &n=
bsp; APPROVAL OF MINUTES
&=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; Regular
& Reorganization Meeting
&=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; January
19, 2006
A motion was offered and seconded to accept the minu= tes of the Reorganization Meeting with minor correction and the Regular Meeting of January 19, 2006. All board m= embers voted yes.
&n=
bsp;  =
; &n=
bsp;  =
; &n=
bsp; APPROVAL OF VOUCHERS
The board motioned, seconded and voted yes to approve payment of the following vouchers as certified by the Finance Office.
&n= bsp;  = ; Robert T. Regan, Esq.  = ; $950.00
&n=
bsp;  =
; &n=
bsp;  =
; &n=
bsp; APPOINTMENT – BOARD ATTORNEY=
Mayor Kaplan reported that the Governing Body has
requested Statements of Qualifications by all professionals in accordance w=
ith
the State Fair and Open Approach.
Following the Mayor’s comments, Joseph L. Ascolese offered a
motion to follow same in hiring professional services for the year 2006.
PAGE THR=
EE,
FEBRUARY 16, 2006
APPOINTM=
ENT
– BOARD ATTORNEY Continued
Mr. Ascolese offered a motion to appoint Robert T. R= egan as the Board Attorney, seconded by Mr. Lamp. Joseph L. Ascolese, Ms. Guercio, M= r. Milliaressis, Mr. Gallagher, Mayor Kaplan and Mr. Lamp voted yes.
APPOINTM=
ENT
– BOARD ENGINEER
Mayor Kaplan offered a motion seconded by Ms. Guerci= o to appoint Neglia Engineering Associates as the Board Engineer. Joseph L. Ascolese, Mr. Milliaress= is, Mr. Gallagher, Mayor Kaplan and Mr. Lamp voted yes.
CORRESPO=
NDENCE
Neglia
Engineering – Landwood Construction
116 Broa=
dway
Mr. Gallagher read Mr. Neglia’s letter into th= e record concerning the neighboring property (Bellini, 130 Broadway) commenting on t= he following:
&n= bsp; &n= bsp; A one-foot high stone wall to be constructed along the property
&n= bsp;  = ; line to the grass swale adjacent to the top of the wall has not
&n= bsp;  = ; been installed.
&n= bsp;  = ; The asphalt sidewalk has been mounted to prevent stormwater
&n= bsp;  = ; runoff from flowing into the Bellini property.
CORRESPO=
NDENCE
Neglia
Engineering – Gulf Station
The following site issues, as noted in correspondenc= e to the Construction Office on December 16, 2005 have not been addressed:
&n= bsp;  = ; Brick fascia has not been installed on the canopy columns.
&n= bsp;  = ; Striping has not been removed from the perimeter of the canopy.
&n= bsp;  = ; Landscaping not installed in accordance with the borough approved
&n= bsp;  = ; plans.
Mr. Gallagher commented that the correspondence prov= ided by Neglia Engineering Associates is in response to concerns and criticisms = of the board regarding the lack of follow-through and enforcement once such matters leave the board.
Block 80=
,
Mr. Gallagher reported that attempts to gather infor= mation relative to the positioning of the second set of antennas on the pole, not = set in accordance with restrictions placed by the board during its hearing of t= he matter, have not been successful. The first set of antennas was set in compliance with instructions and in line with exhibits. However, the parking lot has not b= een paved and striped as required and the second set of antennas, six instead of five, are mounted on external brackets which was expressly prohibited. Because of the transitional phase = of the Building Dept., answers are not forthcoming and response from Cingular is n= ot acceptable. Following discuss= ion and because the current installation’s approval came from the Zoning Board of Adjustment, Mr. Gallagher agreed to investigate the files in order= to determine if a violation has occurred. Mr. Regan commented that the Planning Board lost jurisdiction when the Zoning Board came into being in January 2005. Mr. Gallagher commented that he has copied the Chairman of the Zoning Board so that he is aware of the ongoing situation.
OPEN TO =
THE
PUBLIC
Carol Bellini, 130 Broadway, came forward to comment=
on
the continuing water problem on her property caused by runoff from 116
Broadway. Mr. Regan explained=
that
most Construction Officials are reluctant to revoke a Temporary Certificate=
of
Occupancy knowing that the homeowner would appeal to the County and in most
cases, win the appeal. Mayor =
Kaplan
reported the Governing Body has hired Paul Renaud as Construction
Official/Building Inspector and Bill McGuire as the
&n=
bsp;  =
; &n=
bsp;  =
; &n=
bsp; PAGE FOUR, FEBRUARY 16, 2006
&n=
bsp;  =
; &n=
bsp;  =
; &n=
bsp; OPEN TO THE PUBLIC Continued
Inspector. = span>He noted that Mr. Renaud has focused on enforcement issues in the past and agr= eed to provide him with an overview of this matter for review of possible actio= ns he might be willing to undertake against the builder
Michael Leocata,
A member of the public came forward representing the
owners of
Theresa O’Malley,
Bill McGuire,
Ms. O’Malley commented that she did not mean to imply that the former Construction Officer was to blame for her problems and that many factors went into the delay in notifying the borough of her drain= age issues.
Glenn Bourke,
Carol Bellini returned to comment that her runoff pr= oblems stem from both the Construction Official and Board Engineer’s lack of response to her concerns.
Michael Leocata returned and asked how many times an applicant such as Subdivision Application #716 can cancel or postpone an application and Mr. Gallagher explained the process applicants must follow = by law.
As no = one else came forward, the board moved, seconded and voted to close the meeting to t= he public.
As there was no further business to come before the = board, it was moved, seconded and voted to adjourn at 9:45PM.
&n=
bsp;  =
; &n=
bsp;  =
; &n=
bsp; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p;
&n= bsp;  = ; &n= bsp;  = ; &n= bsp; Linda Grove, Board Clerk